You'll pardon me for once for not using the editorial "we" here, but I'm not 100% sure that the other half of the crack editorial staff agrees with me here.
It occurs to me that I'm writing about this (and have been for a few days now) in the context of a political campaign, and some people have asked me about that. It is, pure and simple, a political campaign. It lost the vestiges of being about zoning long ago.
Political campaigns are about citizen action, and they're about making a statement about the direction in which you want your community, your city, your state, your nation to go.
And that's what this is about, too. States McCarter and the Cedar Creek homeowners association (notice I said the homeowners association, not the homeowners themselves) have drawn the battle lines and have said that they, and they alone, can decide what is right and good and proper for the east side.
To achieve their goal of defeating La Puerta Del Sol, they've made up support numbers that, if the issue weren't as serious as it is, would be ludicrous.
The anti-La Puerta contingent have resorted to mudslinging, accusing Bruno Rubio and his supporters of race-baiting, engaging in "spin", and lobbying the individual Commissioners for their support, even though this is an acceptable, even laudable course of action in a representative democracy.
Most disturbingly, to garner support for their agenda, the anti-LPDS movement, specifically States McCarter and the Cedar Creek Civic Association have resorted to the tactics of misleading the residents of the east side, circulating a petition that so distorted the actual facts that some residents who originally signed the petition opposing LPDS now support the development, after looking into the issue on their own.
To counter these actions, which are frankly unworthy of any elected official or any group which purports to represent a neighborhood, Bruno Rubio, Matt Casey, and the other supporters of LPDS have responded with facts instead of fallacies and have actively sought the input of the community, not only in how to make La Puerta Del Sol more community-friendly, but even in how to gather the full support of the community behind the effort.
Now that the LPDS crew has been successful in getting the vote tabled (a significant victory on its own), the question is clear: How do we win in November?
The answer, as always, is politics. This is a political campaign. Has been for some time, really.
The key to winning this thing on a Commission level is to win it on a community level, and the way to win this on a community level is through a real grassroots campaign.
Notice that I said grassroots. Now, in my mind, what States and the Conservative Citizens Council...I mean, the Cedar Creek Civic Association, are doing is not grassroots. It's, for lack of better jargon, Astroturf. They're creating the appearance of a grassroots movement.
LPDS has the issues and the base to mount a real grassroots campaign. I'm excited to see Matt Casey (props!) posting on here, and even more excited to see him committing to the elements of a grassroots approach. Part of the reason I'm excited is because I'm a real grassroots-head from way back in the days, but also, I'm convinced that a hardcore volunteer-based campaign is going to win this thing.
Wednesday, October 05, 2005
LPDS Redux
Ok, so last night my partner in crime, who was home watching on the tele whilst I was in a cramped back row seat in city hall, needing to pee (I must say that I think I've got a better handle on why "potty parity" became an issue in the Commission now; the bathrooms in city hall are unisex, and I'm sorry ladies, but in that situation y'all tend to monopolize) and sporting a stylish yellow LPDS t-shirt, provided the play-by-play and dare I say some color as well. It is my intention now to provide some post-game analysis. I am going to try to step back, be objective, and heed Commissioner Dodson's call to get rid of the emotion and "see the forest and the trees".
The best way I can think of to do this is to talk about some different areas of broad observation that I made. These are in no particular order, other than the order they occurred to me.
1) RACE
I was actually somewhat surprised at how quickly race was alluded to in the meeting. One of the first speakers said that "if that was the reason(for the opposition, those opposed) should be ashamed of themselves". Others mentioned that they hoped the opposition was not because of the "fear of the unknown", etc. The opponents of course staunchly, and somewhat defensively I think (although I can't necessarily blame them after being accused of racism), denied all such implications.
Perhaps the allegations in this respect from the pro side did go too far. It probably would have been better to focus on the positive reasons to allow the rezoning, which for the most part the pro speakers did actually. Although I can't completely remove the possibility that it does play some small part in this in my own mind, I'm going to take the opponents at their word and assume this is not racially motivated. Doing so allows the focus to remain on the merits of the rezoning itself, which I think cuts in favor of LPDS if properly considered.
2) ALCOHOL
The proximity of Cedars Shoals High School to this establishment that will be serving alcoholic beverages with dinner has always been one of the, well, sillier issues, as one speaker said, in this whole thing (I liked the speaker who said that she was sure Bruno planned to card his patrons just like any other business). I won't rehash the rebuttal argument (the nearness of other alcohol-serving establishments, etc., etc.). I will simply say that this argument really does seem like a red herring thrown in to appeal to emotion. To the opponents credit, at the meeting they mostly abandoned this argument in favor of the general issues of spot zoning, the inappropriateness of this type of development for the location, and the precedent for future development; all of which I'll come to later.
3) NOISE, LIGHTING, TRAFFIC
These issues are similar to the alcohol one, except that they have a higher degree of merit under these particular facts. If LPDS created substantial burdens in these areas, each would be a valid reason to oppose it. The problem is, for the most part these concerns have been addressed in the Planning Commission, and the reality is that LPDS is not likely to cause even a noticeable increase in any of these areas, except for those directly adjacent to the property. Those are NOT the neighborhoods making so much noise against LPDS; rather those are apartment complexes, like Tivoli across the street. Having no concrete evidence either way, I'm going to engage in speculation and suggest that the occupants of those apartment complexes would overwhelmingly support this dining and entertainment option within walking distance. Having also lived in Tivoli, I'll also suggest that those in the apartments are used to the noise and traffic, thank you very much. A very modest increase will likely not be noticed.
It would be a mistake to similarly discard these issues as "silly", though. They actually make up the bread and butter of why several of the Commissioners who would otherwise support LPDS are hesitating (e.g., Jordan, Dodson to some extent, and maybe Chasteen). In other words, the "swing" vote may be won or lost on these issues. Any emails pointing out good factual points about these issues to these and all of the Commissioners (well, not States, he's vested) would be a good thing.
4) STATES' SURVEY, AND OTHER RIDICULOUS STATISTICAL EVIDENCE
95% of what? said what? My favorite exchange of the night was Commissioner Carter "weighing" the evidence and counting his emails to rebut States' survey. While we agree with States that Carter's evidence is not scientific by any means, with all due respect neither is States. He revealingly stated later that the "95%" was 19 out of 20 people. How were these 20 people chosen? Was the sample representative of any population, let alone the relevant one? By the way, what is the relevant one? Athens? The East Side? residents along Cedars Shoals Drive? Cedar Creek residents (which I think is actually where all 20 came from)?
As to the petitions, there are accounts of people being brow-beaten into opposing LPDS, and doing so after being fed grossly inaccurate facts, such as Bruno intends to open a night club in their neighborhood. I don't know if these accounts are true, but I'd like to hear from some of the signers as to the circumstances under which the petition was circulated. A couple of the pro speakers did in fact mention that they were speaking in support after having previously signed the petition opposing LPDS.
While we're doing surveys of not necessarily representative populations, let's take a look at the 3 minute speakers at the meeting. By my count, there were 20 in favor, 6 against, and 1 "concerned". This does not count Bruno or the head of the Cedar Creek Assoc.; technically that would add 1 each to the for and against categories. This sample is at least as good as States', and it says that about 75% are in favor. Oh, and by the way, somewhere close to half of those in favor (unfortunately I failed to get an exact count) lived in either Cedar Creek or other nearby neighborhoods, and almost all of them were from the east side.
Ultimately, while the opinion of those most affected by the decision should certainly be considered with great weight, let's be careful about how we define that group, and let's actually make an honest attempt to ascertain what that opinion is.
5) SPOT ZONING
This is one of the opponents more legitimate points. All of the hand-wringing on other issues aside, this is a spot zone. The ACC government is being asked to change the rules for one development. We agree with the opponents that this is not something that we should be in the habit of doing a lot. Routine spot zoning renders the whole concept of zoning meaningless.
That being said, LPDS is the iconic example of why spot zoning should be allowed in certain instances. The lot has already been rezoned for Cofer's. As Commissioner Hoard verified, any new development would require rezoning. In other words, for ANY OTHER BUSINESS to go in the Cofer's lot, except for an identical greenhouse, a spot zoning is gonna have to happen. The options therefore are 1) let it sit there empty or 2) decide what the best development option is, and go for it. Perhaps the original Cofer's rezoning was a mistake, as States suggested. However, that toothpaste is out of the tube, and we've got to figure out the best way to go forward. I think it's LPDS, hands down.
6) PRECEDENT
The other related argument from the opponents is that granting this rezone will set a precedent for other similar proposed developments to take over Cedar Shoals Drive. Again, if this were true, it would certainly present a problem. The problem with this argument is that it is essentially a slippery slope argument. Just because this rezoning is granted doesn't mean the entire street is destined to be rezoned. Each rezoning request would present its own set of facts to be weighed by the M&C, and no future set of facts will the same as these. There is only one Cofer's sitting vacant to be redeveloped; there is only one Bruno Rubio. If this is really the concern (and I think it is for many of those opposed), I respectfully suggest to those holding such concern to relax, and don't fear change so much. It can be good. Which leads me into my last segment (I think).
7) DEMOGRAPHICS
Specifically those of the two groups, the pro and the con. Aside from Bruno himself, and the Latin theme of LPDS and the cultural enrichment it promises, let's look at the group of pro speakers. There were whites, blacks, Hispanics, and other nationalities represented. There were young and old. There were those of different classes.
The opposed group was all older, white, probably fairly well to do (judging by the fact that they own homes in Cedar Creek) people. I point this out not to bring the race debate back up, but merely as a sociological observation. What is it about moving in to that group that makes people become so conservative? I use "conservative" in the classical definitional sense, not the political sense. This group of people really dislikes change, and seems to shy away from the different and the unknown. I honestly hope for myself, and I'm not just saying this, that I can avoid that metamorphisis when I reach that stage of life. I hope I will always be the kind of person that would embrace something like LPDS with open arms.
Oh well, all of this typing, and all we got was a 9-0 table vote. That means you get to hear about it from us for another month. That's probably just as well, cause I'm sure I missed something in this nonetheless God-awfully long post (sorry bout that, by the way).
That's it for now.
The best way I can think of to do this is to talk about some different areas of broad observation that I made. These are in no particular order, other than the order they occurred to me.
1) RACE
I was actually somewhat surprised at how quickly race was alluded to in the meeting. One of the first speakers said that "if that was the reason(for the opposition, those opposed) should be ashamed of themselves". Others mentioned that they hoped the opposition was not because of the "fear of the unknown", etc. The opponents of course staunchly, and somewhat defensively I think (although I can't necessarily blame them after being accused of racism), denied all such implications.
Perhaps the allegations in this respect from the pro side did go too far. It probably would have been better to focus on the positive reasons to allow the rezoning, which for the most part the pro speakers did actually. Although I can't completely remove the possibility that it does play some small part in this in my own mind, I'm going to take the opponents at their word and assume this is not racially motivated. Doing so allows the focus to remain on the merits of the rezoning itself, which I think cuts in favor of LPDS if properly considered.
2) ALCOHOL
The proximity of Cedars Shoals High School to this establishment that will be serving alcoholic beverages with dinner has always been one of the, well, sillier issues, as one speaker said, in this whole thing (I liked the speaker who said that she was sure Bruno planned to card his patrons just like any other business). I won't rehash the rebuttal argument (the nearness of other alcohol-serving establishments, etc., etc.). I will simply say that this argument really does seem like a red herring thrown in to appeal to emotion. To the opponents credit, at the meeting they mostly abandoned this argument in favor of the general issues of spot zoning, the inappropriateness of this type of development for the location, and the precedent for future development; all of which I'll come to later.
3) NOISE, LIGHTING, TRAFFIC
These issues are similar to the alcohol one, except that they have a higher degree of merit under these particular facts. If LPDS created substantial burdens in these areas, each would be a valid reason to oppose it. The problem is, for the most part these concerns have been addressed in the Planning Commission, and the reality is that LPDS is not likely to cause even a noticeable increase in any of these areas, except for those directly adjacent to the property. Those are NOT the neighborhoods making so much noise against LPDS; rather those are apartment complexes, like Tivoli across the street. Having no concrete evidence either way, I'm going to engage in speculation and suggest that the occupants of those apartment complexes would overwhelmingly support this dining and entertainment option within walking distance. Having also lived in Tivoli, I'll also suggest that those in the apartments are used to the noise and traffic, thank you very much. A very modest increase will likely not be noticed.
It would be a mistake to similarly discard these issues as "silly", though. They actually make up the bread and butter of why several of the Commissioners who would otherwise support LPDS are hesitating (e.g., Jordan, Dodson to some extent, and maybe Chasteen). In other words, the "swing" vote may be won or lost on these issues. Any emails pointing out good factual points about these issues to these and all of the Commissioners (well, not States, he's vested) would be a good thing.
4) STATES' SURVEY, AND OTHER RIDICULOUS STATISTICAL EVIDENCE
95% of what? said what? My favorite exchange of the night was Commissioner Carter "weighing" the evidence and counting his emails to rebut States' survey. While we agree with States that Carter's evidence is not scientific by any means, with all due respect neither is States. He revealingly stated later that the "95%" was 19 out of 20 people. How were these 20 people chosen? Was the sample representative of any population, let alone the relevant one? By the way, what is the relevant one? Athens? The East Side? residents along Cedars Shoals Drive? Cedar Creek residents (which I think is actually where all 20 came from)?
As to the petitions, there are accounts of people being brow-beaten into opposing LPDS, and doing so after being fed grossly inaccurate facts, such as Bruno intends to open a night club in their neighborhood. I don't know if these accounts are true, but I'd like to hear from some of the signers as to the circumstances under which the petition was circulated. A couple of the pro speakers did in fact mention that they were speaking in support after having previously signed the petition opposing LPDS.
While we're doing surveys of not necessarily representative populations, let's take a look at the 3 minute speakers at the meeting. By my count, there were 20 in favor, 6 against, and 1 "concerned". This does not count Bruno or the head of the Cedar Creek Assoc.; technically that would add 1 each to the for and against categories. This sample is at least as good as States', and it says that about 75% are in favor. Oh, and by the way, somewhere close to half of those in favor (unfortunately I failed to get an exact count) lived in either Cedar Creek or other nearby neighborhoods, and almost all of them were from the east side.
Ultimately, while the opinion of those most affected by the decision should certainly be considered with great weight, let's be careful about how we define that group, and let's actually make an honest attempt to ascertain what that opinion is.
5) SPOT ZONING
This is one of the opponents more legitimate points. All of the hand-wringing on other issues aside, this is a spot zone. The ACC government is being asked to change the rules for one development. We agree with the opponents that this is not something that we should be in the habit of doing a lot. Routine spot zoning renders the whole concept of zoning meaningless.
That being said, LPDS is the iconic example of why spot zoning should be allowed in certain instances. The lot has already been rezoned for Cofer's. As Commissioner Hoard verified, any new development would require rezoning. In other words, for ANY OTHER BUSINESS to go in the Cofer's lot, except for an identical greenhouse, a spot zoning is gonna have to happen. The options therefore are 1) let it sit there empty or 2) decide what the best development option is, and go for it. Perhaps the original Cofer's rezoning was a mistake, as States suggested. However, that toothpaste is out of the tube, and we've got to figure out the best way to go forward. I think it's LPDS, hands down.
6) PRECEDENT
The other related argument from the opponents is that granting this rezone will set a precedent for other similar proposed developments to take over Cedar Shoals Drive. Again, if this were true, it would certainly present a problem. The problem with this argument is that it is essentially a slippery slope argument. Just because this rezoning is granted doesn't mean the entire street is destined to be rezoned. Each rezoning request would present its own set of facts to be weighed by the M&C, and no future set of facts will the same as these. There is only one Cofer's sitting vacant to be redeveloped; there is only one Bruno Rubio. If this is really the concern (and I think it is for many of those opposed), I respectfully suggest to those holding such concern to relax, and don't fear change so much. It can be good. Which leads me into my last segment (I think).
7) DEMOGRAPHICS
Specifically those of the two groups, the pro and the con. Aside from Bruno himself, and the Latin theme of LPDS and the cultural enrichment it promises, let's look at the group of pro speakers. There were whites, blacks, Hispanics, and other nationalities represented. There were young and old. There were those of different classes.
The opposed group was all older, white, probably fairly well to do (judging by the fact that they own homes in Cedar Creek) people. I point this out not to bring the race debate back up, but merely as a sociological observation. What is it about moving in to that group that makes people become so conservative? I use "conservative" in the classical definitional sense, not the political sense. This group of people really dislikes change, and seems to shy away from the different and the unknown. I honestly hope for myself, and I'm not just saying this, that I can avoid that metamorphisis when I reach that stage of life. I hope I will always be the kind of person that would embrace something like LPDS with open arms.
Oh well, all of this typing, and all we got was a 9-0 table vote. That means you get to hear about it from us for another month. That's probably just as well, cause I'm sure I missed something in this nonetheless God-awfully long post (sorry bout that, by the way).
That's it for now.
Tuesday, October 04, 2005
Tables. Waiting.
Tables. Waiting.
Well, we didn’t get an up-or-down vote, but this is still a victory for Bruno and La Puerta Del Sol. Tabling this thing until November helps the cause.
We really believe that the anti-LPDS folks have shot their wad. They’ve shown their opposition and they’ve shown the, well, for lack of a better word, the homogeneity of their ranks.
Bruno and his crew are (we hope) just getting started. Now they’ve got the big Mo, and a following of people who are good and juiced up about this. Now let’s see what they can do with the Mo.
And yeah, we’re going to keep bugging you about this until the first Tuesday in November.
Although, we reckon you don’t have to worry about emailing States.
Well, we didn’t get an up-or-down vote, but this is still a victory for Bruno and La Puerta Del Sol. Tabling this thing until November helps the cause.
We really believe that the anti-LPDS folks have shot their wad. They’ve shown their opposition and they’ve shown the, well, for lack of a better word, the homogeneity of their ranks.
Bruno and his crew are (we hope) just getting started. Now they’ve got the big Mo, and a following of people who are good and juiced up about this. Now let’s see what they can do with the Mo.
And yeah, we’re going to keep bugging you about this until the first Tuesday in November.
Although, we reckon you don’t have to worry about emailing States.
Mid-Commission Update
Mid-Commission Update
Chances are that if you’re remotely interested in La Puerta Del Sol, you’re already either at the Commission meeting or tuned in on the boob tube (Channel 7). But we’d like to update you briefly on what’s going on. With one member of the crack editorial staff at the meeting, and the other (who unfortunately had a late class) watching at home, rest assured you’re getting the best local coverage you can find.
Here’s a few points to note:
Chances are that if you’re remotely interested in La Puerta Del Sol, you’re already either at the Commission meeting or tuned in on the boob tube (Channel 7). But we’d like to update you briefly on what’s going on. With one member of the crack editorial staff at the meeting, and the other (who unfortunately had a late class) watching at home, rest assured you’re getting the best local coverage you can find.
Here’s a few points to note:
- Mayoral hopeful Andy Rusk (thanks Andy!) talking in a heartfelt manner about buying sandwiches from Bruno Rubio when Caliente Cab was just a trailer in a vacant lot.
- Local business owner Annette Nelson (who ran against States McCarter in 2004) talking about the positive impact of the LPDS development.
- A wide variety of residents (most from the East Side) saying good things about Bruno and LPDS. This particular member of the editorial staff has heard no opposition to the plan since we tuned in at about 8:30 pm.
- And hey, Matt and Bruno, the shirts look great! Can we get one too?
Dateline City Hall
We will playing amateur (although hopefully not amateurish) journalist on this one. At least one of us (probably only one of us) will be spying the whole thing, and like Fox News, we'll report and you'll decide. However, unlike Fox News, the Bill O'Reilly logic-defying logic will be absent, and there will be no graphics of a screaming eagle.
All is calm at the moment in front of the double-barrelled cannon, but like a CNN rookie, I will sit here and await Hurricane Puerta to make landfall. Fortunately, it's not raining, so I won't be wearing one of those silly plastic numbers you usually see on those guys.
Jon.
All is calm at the moment in front of the double-barrelled cannon, but like a CNN rookie, I will sit here and await Hurricane Puerta to make landfall. Fortunately, it's not raining, so I won't be wearing one of those silly plastic numbers you usually see on those guys.
Jon.
LPDS, possibly the last time we'll beg you to email your Commissioners on this one
Hi kids.
So, anything interesting happening in the Classic City today? Hmm...let us think...oh yeah!
The Commission is voting on La Puerta Del Sol tonight!
After weeks and weeks of opining, name-calling, a little bit of race-baiting, and a lot of angry babbling (by one Commissioner in particular), this thing is finally going to come up to a vote tonight.
We'll start with our usual call to email the Commission. There's still time, if you haven't made your feelings known yet. If you have been a good citizen and made your opinions known, then hey, do it again. Here are your relevant email addresses.
Mayor: Heidi Davison
District 1: Charles Carter
District 2: Harry Sims (no email. Boooo!)
District 3: George Maxwell
District 4: Alice Kinman
District 5: David Lynn
District 6: Carl Jordan
District 7: Kathy Hoard
District 8: States McCarter
District 9: Tom Chasteen
District 10: Elton Dodson
Finally, we thought we'd leave you with a few open-ended questions to think over.
Don't be fooled by the scoops that we got. We're still Athens Politics from the block.
So, anything interesting happening in the Classic City today? Hmm...let us think...oh yeah!
The Commission is voting on La Puerta Del Sol tonight!
After weeks and weeks of opining, name-calling, a little bit of race-baiting, and a lot of angry babbling (by one Commissioner in particular), this thing is finally going to come up to a vote tonight.
We'll start with our usual call to email the Commission. There's still time, if you haven't made your feelings known yet. If you have been a good citizen and made your opinions known, then hey, do it again. Here are your relevant email addresses.
Mayor: Heidi Davison
District 1: Charles Carter
District 2: Harry Sims (no email. Boooo!)
District 3: George Maxwell
District 4: Alice Kinman
District 5: David Lynn
District 6: Carl Jordan
District 7: Kathy Hoard
District 8: States McCarter
District 9: Tom Chasteen
District 10: Elton Dodson
Finally, we thought we'd leave you with a few open-ended questions to think over.
- If this thing passes, will States McCarter explode into a mushroom cloud of cantankerous huffiness?
- If it doesn't pass, will Bruno et al seek to redevelop elsewhere in town?
- What, if any, retribution will States seek against those Commissioners who dare to vote for LPDS?
- How does the vote (whichever way it goes) affect politics in the Cedar Creek Homeowner's Association?
- Why hasn't States' hand-picked District 8 successor spoken up on this? For that matter, why hasn't Annette Nelson, who ran against him last year?
- If this doesn't pass, was the community really against it, or was the part of the community against it better organized?
Don't be fooled by the scoops that we got. We're still Athens Politics from the block.
Monday, October 03, 2005
La Puerta Del Sol Madness, One Day Left
Two letters in the ABH today about LPDS.
One guy writes in to say that States isn't a racist. Ok, we'll buy that. We actually agree. States isn't a racist, he's just a stubborn, cantankerous, angry lame-duck commissioner who has his political panties in a wad because Bruno Rubio didn't kiss his ring and beg him to shepherd the LPDS project through the Commission.
Someone who is presumably a Cedar Creek resident reminds people that States McCarter and the Cedar Creek Homeowner's Association doesn't speak for everyone.
Hey, the big meeting is tomorrow. Bruno and Matt ask that everyone interested in supporting LPDS show up at 6pm at City Hall. Apparently, they've got some big doings planned. We're looking forward to this one.
Did you email your Commissioners yet? Check here for their addresses.
Tips.
One guy writes in to say that States isn't a racist. Ok, we'll buy that. We actually agree. States isn't a racist, he's just a stubborn, cantankerous, angry lame-duck commissioner who has his political panties in a wad because Bruno Rubio didn't kiss his ring and beg him to shepherd the LPDS project through the Commission.
Someone who is presumably a Cedar Creek resident reminds people that States McCarter and the Cedar Creek Homeowner's Association doesn't speak for everyone.
Hey, the big meeting is tomorrow. Bruno and Matt ask that everyone interested in supporting LPDS show up at 6pm at City Hall. Apparently, they've got some big doings planned. We're looking forward to this one.
Did you email your Commissioners yet? Check here for their addresses.
Tips.
Cowsert Joins State Senate Race
The ABH is reporting today that Bill Cowsert, local attorney and candidate for State House in 2004, is joining the race for State Senate.
Now, as most of you who are in tune with Athens politics (the concept, not the blog) already know, Cowsert, a Republican, ran against Jane Kidd for State House in 2004. Now, he's running against Jane Kidd again, this time for State Senate.
This race is a much better fit for Bill Cowsert. Considering the makeup of the district, Cowsert's 44% in his State House race was borderline impressive. (For reference, Kerry won about 60%, and US Senate candidate Denise Majette took about 56%). In short, a Democrat should be able to break 50% in Kidd's State House district without breaking a sweat. The State Senate district actually has numbers that a Republican can work with.
Despite the fact that this seat has been held for four years by a Republican, and despite the fact that said Republican knocked off a pretty popular incumbent to win the seat in 2002, we're not ready to call this a "Republican seat" yet.
To be sure, Cowsert has some significant advantages coming into the race. Name recognition, for one. Brian Kemp's support and connections for another. And, lest we forget, the mighty political force that is Oconee County, which frankly, has been putting ACC to shame on voter turnout.
And that's the thing. Numerically speaking, there's no reason why this seat should be Republican. But lately, the Republicans just seem to want it more. We love Doug Haines, and we love Becky Vaughn (who ran for the seat in 2004), but as much as it pains us to say this, they just got flat outworked.
The candidate who wins this race will be the one who puts people in the field (Athens voters love canvassing), raises enough money to win the direct mail race, and doesn't waste time relying on their state party for money and resources. (More on that in a later post)
It's too early to pick a winner here. Obviously, fundraising is the mother's milk of politics, and it remains to be seen whether mommy likes Jane or Bill more. But there's more to it than who can raise the most money.
In the end, this is going to come down to who wants it more, and who's going to work the hardest.
Will Jane Kidd be the third Democrat in as many elections to get outworked by the GOP? We're not sure. We hope not, because as much as we like Bill Cowsert personally (and we do), we'd rather see a Democrat in the State Senate. And, pardon us for being a little Athens-centric, but we also humbly believe that a Democrat is the best fit for the district as a whole.
Stay tuned. We'll be following this one closely.
Tips.
Now, as most of you who are in tune with Athens politics (the concept, not the blog) already know, Cowsert, a Republican, ran against Jane Kidd for State House in 2004. Now, he's running against Jane Kidd again, this time for State Senate.
This race is a much better fit for Bill Cowsert. Considering the makeup of the district, Cowsert's 44% in his State House race was borderline impressive. (For reference, Kerry won about 60%, and US Senate candidate Denise Majette took about 56%). In short, a Democrat should be able to break 50% in Kidd's State House district without breaking a sweat. The State Senate district actually has numbers that a Republican can work with.
Despite the fact that this seat has been held for four years by a Republican, and despite the fact that said Republican knocked off a pretty popular incumbent to win the seat in 2002, we're not ready to call this a "Republican seat" yet.
To be sure, Cowsert has some significant advantages coming into the race. Name recognition, for one. Brian Kemp's support and connections for another. And, lest we forget, the mighty political force that is Oconee County, which frankly, has been putting ACC to shame on voter turnout.
And that's the thing. Numerically speaking, there's no reason why this seat should be Republican. But lately, the Republicans just seem to want it more. We love Doug Haines, and we love Becky Vaughn (who ran for the seat in 2004), but as much as it pains us to say this, they just got flat outworked.
The candidate who wins this race will be the one who puts people in the field (Athens voters love canvassing), raises enough money to win the direct mail race, and doesn't waste time relying on their state party for money and resources. (More on that in a later post)
It's too early to pick a winner here. Obviously, fundraising is the mother's milk of politics, and it remains to be seen whether mommy likes Jane or Bill more. But there's more to it than who can raise the most money.
In the end, this is going to come down to who wants it more, and who's going to work the hardest.
Will Jane Kidd be the third Democrat in as many elections to get outworked by the GOP? We're not sure. We hope not, because as much as we like Bill Cowsert personally (and we do), we'd rather see a Democrat in the State Senate. And, pardon us for being a little Athens-centric, but we also humbly believe that a Democrat is the best fit for the district as a whole.
Stay tuned. We'll be following this one closely.
Tips.
Saturday, October 01, 2005
Republican redrawn Congressional map approved
The ABH reports that Georgia's Congressional map, which was redrawn this year by Republicans in the legislature, and which must be approved by the DOJ because Georgia has had some, let's just say "issues" with race in the past, has been so approved. Athens will therefore be in Charlie Norwood's district for next year's election. There's been some rumblings that Norwood might not seek reelection for health reasons. If that is true, it could be a wide open seat, albeit probably still likely going to a Republican. Expect a great deal about this as we progress toward next year's election.
By the way, Athens' current rep John Barrow has announced his intention to run in the 12th District, which he currently represents, but which as redrawn will not contain Athens.
Can't wait to cover real elections next year. As always, stay tuned.
By the way, Athens' current rep John Barrow has announced his intention to run in the 12th District, which he currently represents, but which as redrawn will not contain Athens.
Can't wait to cover real elections next year. As always, stay tuned.
Friday, September 30, 2005
One more post on LPDS, and then I'll shut up (maybe)
As we come within a few days of the vote, I feel I've gotta touch on this one again, even though we've just about beat it into the ground. Here's a sample comment from the LPDS website that I wanna talk about:
"I first heard about La Puerta Del Sol in a newsletter that I received from my eastside commissioner. In the newsletter this commissioner was very strongly opposed to the project and was encouraging me to view the project in a negative way as well. I decided to take the time to get to know more about La Puerta Del Sol by attending a meeting and learning the details for myself. I went to the meeting and I discussed many of the concerns, that my commissioner was projecting on the project, with the actual developers and Bruno (the owner). When I left that meeting I was in complete support of the project and I could not understand why my commissioner was trying to convince me otherwise. I view La Puerta Del Sol as a wonderful asset to our community and especially to the eastside of Athens!"
Now granted, this is anecdotal evidence from the website promoting the project, so it's hardly conclusive or free from bias. It's entirely possible that there's just as much anecdotal evidence on the other side. My concern is that many of those opposed did not do the independent investigation that this individual did, and simply oppose LPDS based on the contents of States' newsletter. Given what was obviously a campaign by States to sabotage this thing, he certainly is in no position to criticize the legitimate PR efforts of the LPDS gang.
Elton, if you read this before the vote, I certainly hope you will consider this evidence when you are weighing the heavy opposition that you say the neighborhood associations have expressed.
As for this member of the crack editorial staff, I intend to be there Tuesday before 6, to see what these "Silent Supports" are all about. I'm sure that I will end up becoming one of them, whatever they turn out to be. Hope to see you all there.
Viva la puerta
"I first heard about La Puerta Del Sol in a newsletter that I received from my eastside commissioner. In the newsletter this commissioner was very strongly opposed to the project and was encouraging me to view the project in a negative way as well. I decided to take the time to get to know more about La Puerta Del Sol by attending a meeting and learning the details for myself. I went to the meeting and I discussed many of the concerns, that my commissioner was projecting on the project, with the actual developers and Bruno (the owner). When I left that meeting I was in complete support of the project and I could not understand why my commissioner was trying to convince me otherwise. I view La Puerta Del Sol as a wonderful asset to our community and especially to the eastside of Athens!"
Now granted, this is anecdotal evidence from the website promoting the project, so it's hardly conclusive or free from bias. It's entirely possible that there's just as much anecdotal evidence on the other side. My concern is that many of those opposed did not do the independent investigation that this individual did, and simply oppose LPDS based on the contents of States' newsletter. Given what was obviously a campaign by States to sabotage this thing, he certainly is in no position to criticize the legitimate PR efforts of the LPDS gang.
Elton, if you read this before the vote, I certainly hope you will consider this evidence when you are weighing the heavy opposition that you say the neighborhood associations have expressed.
As for this member of the crack editorial staff, I intend to be there Tuesday before 6, to see what these "Silent Supports" are all about. I'm sure that I will end up becoming one of them, whatever they turn out to be. Hope to see you all there.
Viva la puerta
Thursday, September 29, 2005
Here comes the judge?
Chief Justice Roberts having now been predictably coronated, it is time to discuss who will be ordained to replace O' Connor. One named being tossed about is Georgia attorney, professor, executive, etc., Larry D. Thompson. Thompson is senior vice president and general counsel of PepsiCo., as well as a scholar and trustee of the Brookings Institution. He has a distinguished legal career, most famously as a big shot at King & Spalding, as a U.S. Attorney, and more recently, as Deputy Attorney General in the Bush Administration. He reportedly retired from that post in 2003 to "return to the private sector" (he would flatly deny it, but I can't help feeling it had something to do with differences he had with Ashcroft). He was the main man in charge of anti-terrorism prosecutions. After he left the AG's office in 2003, he returned to Atlanta and his present post at Pepsi, as well as teaching a class at UGA Law School on Anti-Terrorism and Criminal Procedure (a class which, by the way, one member of the crack editiorial staff was in; we won't talk about the grade received).
One of the main reasons that his name is in the pot is, of course, the fact that he's one of a small (although not as small as it used to be) number of conservative minority candidates with the qualifications to be in the pot. And since Bush already picked a white man to fill the spot of one of only two women on the SC once, most are saying there's little chance he'll do it again (although this member of the crack editorial staff isn't necessarily convinced of that).
Personally, gleaning what I could from him as a professor, he would probably be a pretty good candidate, and would probably be much less of an idealogue than some of the Strictly-Constructed Constitution-thumpers on the list. However, that's probably a strike against him from the Bush administration's perspective, especially since Roberts turned out not to be that, at least not overtly (he gave all the right answers on recognizing a right to privacy generally and respecting the precedent of Roe and Casey, e.g.). They're gonna need a real right-winger to keep the base happy.
We'll be following this closely, especially if Thompson somehow ends up being the nominee. Stay tuned.
One of the main reasons that his name is in the pot is, of course, the fact that he's one of a small (although not as small as it used to be) number of conservative minority candidates with the qualifications to be in the pot. And since Bush already picked a white man to fill the spot of one of only two women on the SC once, most are saying there's little chance he'll do it again (although this member of the crack editorial staff isn't necessarily convinced of that).
Personally, gleaning what I could from him as a professor, he would probably be a pretty good candidate, and would probably be much less of an idealogue than some of the Strictly-Constructed Constitution-thumpers on the list. However, that's probably a strike against him from the Bush administration's perspective, especially since Roberts turned out not to be that, at least not overtly (he gave all the right answers on recognizing a right to privacy generally and respecting the precedent of Roe and Casey, e.g.). They're gonna need a real right-winger to keep the base happy.
We'll be following this closely, especially if Thompson somehow ends up being the nominee. Stay tuned.
La Menage a Prince?
Hi kids.
Well, you may have noticed one local political issue that hasn't gotten much coverage here - the proposed three-laning of Prince Avenue, in all or in part, depending on who you listen to.
To be honest, we don't have a whole heck of a lot to say on the matter. It's being covered very well by other local nontraditional media gurus like Hilary and Jmac, to say nothing of the extensive coverage given to it by Flagpole.
Also, discussion on three-laning Prince inevitably turns to discussion on bike lanes, which tends to make that little vein on the crack editorial staff's foreheads start throbbing.
But, if you want our opinion, read this. We couldn't have said it any better ourselves.
Tips.
Well, you may have noticed one local political issue that hasn't gotten much coverage here - the proposed three-laning of Prince Avenue, in all or in part, depending on who you listen to.
To be honest, we don't have a whole heck of a lot to say on the matter. It's being covered very well by other local nontraditional media gurus like Hilary and Jmac, to say nothing of the extensive coverage given to it by Flagpole.
Also, discussion on three-laning Prince inevitably turns to discussion on bike lanes, which tends to make that little vein on the crack editorial staff's foreheads start throbbing.
But, if you want our opinion, read this. We couldn't have said it any better ourselves.
Tips.
Judgment Day, Five Days and Counting
For those of you interested in the La Puerta Del Sol issue, and who are not on the LPDS mailing list (Shame on you. We'll bet you haven't emailed your Commissioners yet either!), we humbly present the plan of action concerning the October 4th Commission meeting, as submitted by the LPDS folks.
We'll be there. We hope you will too.
Buenos DÃas [Good Morning],
We'll be there. We hope you will too.
Buenos DÃas [Good Morning],
We just wanted to send an important reminder to all our members about the upcoming Mayor and Commissioners meeting next Tuesday evening. We hope that you will join us in support of this unique project. We feel that we have worked extremely hard to ensure the community is informed about our plans, and that the facts surrounding this rezoning request make their way to the public.It is true that some people do not support La Puerta del Sol, with particular emphasis on a single neighborhood, Cedar Creek (although many Cedar Creek residents have voiced their wholehearted support for this rezoning as well). However, we feel that such reports of opposition-and the reasons some people believe they should oppose-have been largely exaggerated and a great deal of misinformation has been conveyed within our community. Our personal experience has been that the overwhelming majority of those who are well-informed about this rezoning are also supporters. Furthermore, many community members who may have opposed this rezoning initially have shifted to support the proposal upon learning more about it.
We would like to encourage you attend this meeting, and make sure you voice is recognized to ensure that the the Mayor and Commissioners make the proper decision. We will be meeting outside City Hall at 6:00 PM on Tuesday. If you plan on attending try to make there a little earlier, so we can put a face to these email addresses! We would love to meet you and thank you in person. For those of you that might like to speak during the Citizen Input portion of the meeting we can use this time to help answer any last minute questions as well. If you do not feel comfortable speaking during the Citizen input, but would still like to show your support please come down to City Hall early, as we believe we have a unique way for Silent Supports to make a powerful statement (we hope this has now peaked your curiosity enough to get you down there by 6:00).
What: Mayor and Commission Meeting :When: Tuesday, October 4th, 2005 - 7:00 PM (6:00 PM if your still curious)Where: City HallWhy: Mayor & commissioners meeting to vote for acceptance of La Puerta Del Sol rezoning request.We sincerely appreciate the support you have demonstrated, and are looking forward to meeting you all Tuesday evening.
Regards... LPDS!
Cox Runs Radio Ads, Republicans, Democrats Cry Foul
The ABH editorializes today about the bipartisan bitching and moaning about Cathy Cox's decision to run radio ads about investment fraud targeted to African-Americans.
We don't really have a dog in the Democratic primary on that race yet. We like Taylor personally (who couldn't like the big guy?), but suspect that Cox is a little more electable.
Also, while both campaigns are consultant-driven, meaning that folks up in Washington, D.C. are deciding what you here in Georgia should know about each candidate, Taylor's is more off-putting because it is so slick. You can bet your bottom dollar that Taylor will have the best TV ads and mail pieces.
And, the response from the Taylor campaign (because we're betting that it's Taylor's folks that the ABH alludes to as, "some of the state's Democrats"), is typical of the consultant-driven campaign. Taylor's campaign has to say something, either on the record or not for attribution, because it's what's expected of them.
But, Cathy's radio ads don't really matter. Not this early, and, if they're running closer to time, they probably won't matter much then.
There's an art to designing a good ad. There's an even more arcane art in placing ads effectively. As campaign propaganda, these ads don't measure up in either capacity. In the first place, there's no direct correlation between the, "This is Cathy Cox, don't get screwed by fraudulent investment scams," message, and the "This is Cathy Cox, vote for me in 13 months," message that critics are trying to imply is implicit in the ads. Hell, we'd be surprised if 10% of any radio market you wanted to choose in Georgia, be it black, white, latino, or frat-boy douchebag rock, could even tell you the name of even one candidate for Governor. (Especially the latter category, but we digress).
Also, radio ads alone will not do much to drum up support in any community or demographic (Neither will TV or mail). Anything media-related is going to have to utilize the gamut of genres (meaning TV, radio, direct mail, and oneline communications). Then, it still has to be backed up by a good ground game.
Y'see, it's Cathy Cox's job, her J to the O to the B, to protect Georgians from investment scams. And, the largest demographic groups to be targeted by scammers are, not African-Americans, and the elderly. (If you're elderly and black, you're super-screwed, but what else is new in Georgia politics?) An effective way to reach out to that demo is through radio. If the group most often falling prey to scams like this were young, well-educated, white males who make over $35,000 a year, then Cox would probably run banner advertising on the internet.
She's doing her job. We'll reiterate though, that Marky-Mark (and presumably his "funky bunch" of consultants) are also doing their jobs in complaining about it.
There is one way that these ads are effective beyond their intended purpose, and that's increasing her name recognition. Still, that's the same thing that Taylor does every time he makes a ruckus in the State Senate (man, we love his ruckuses, or is it ruckusi), or for that matter, the same thing the Gubner does when he randomly cancels school. (We are so topical sometimes, it hurts). It's all about letting folks know you're out there doing your job.
Tips, rumors, gossip.
We don't really have a dog in the Democratic primary on that race yet. We like Taylor personally (who couldn't like the big guy?), but suspect that Cox is a little more electable.
Also, while both campaigns are consultant-driven, meaning that folks up in Washington, D.C. are deciding what you here in Georgia should know about each candidate, Taylor's is more off-putting because it is so slick. You can bet your bottom dollar that Taylor will have the best TV ads and mail pieces.
And, the response from the Taylor campaign (because we're betting that it's Taylor's folks that the ABH alludes to as, "some of the state's Democrats"), is typical of the consultant-driven campaign. Taylor's campaign has to say something, either on the record or not for attribution, because it's what's expected of them.
But, Cathy's radio ads don't really matter. Not this early, and, if they're running closer to time, they probably won't matter much then.
There's an art to designing a good ad. There's an even more arcane art in placing ads effectively. As campaign propaganda, these ads don't measure up in either capacity. In the first place, there's no direct correlation between the, "This is Cathy Cox, don't get screwed by fraudulent investment scams," message, and the "This is Cathy Cox, vote for me in 13 months," message that critics are trying to imply is implicit in the ads. Hell, we'd be surprised if 10% of any radio market you wanted to choose in Georgia, be it black, white, latino, or frat-boy douchebag rock, could even tell you the name of even one candidate for Governor. (Especially the latter category, but we digress).
Also, radio ads alone will not do much to drum up support in any community or demographic (Neither will TV or mail). Anything media-related is going to have to utilize the gamut of genres (meaning TV, radio, direct mail, and oneline communications). Then, it still has to be backed up by a good ground game.
Y'see, it's Cathy Cox's job, her J to the O to the B, to protect Georgians from investment scams. And, the largest demographic groups to be targeted by scammers are, not African-Americans, and the elderly. (If you're elderly and black, you're super-screwed, but what else is new in Georgia politics?) An effective way to reach out to that demo is through radio. If the group most often falling prey to scams like this were young, well-educated, white males who make over $35,000 a year, then Cox would probably run banner advertising on the internet.
She's doing her job. We'll reiterate though, that Marky-Mark (and presumably his "funky bunch" of consultants) are also doing their jobs in complaining about it.
There is one way that these ads are effective beyond their intended purpose, and that's increasing her name recognition. Still, that's the same thing that Taylor does every time he makes a ruckus in the State Senate (man, we love his ruckuses, or is it ruckusi), or for that matter, the same thing the Gubner does when he randomly cancels school. (We are so topical sometimes, it hurts). It's all about letting folks know you're out there doing your job.
Tips, rumors, gossip.
Wednesday, September 28, 2005
Mishmash
Union Point
We're intrigued, in a morbid sort of way, by the whole Union Point political shenanigans from last year. Allison Floyd (in what we humbly thought was one of the best pieces we've seen her do) wrote up a nice story on it last year, which is worth checking out, if you have no idea what we're talking about. If you do have a clue as to what we're referring, then today's ABH has a little somethin-somethin about the state of affairs now. Still, we're troubled by this passage.
Madison and Greensboro? Madison and Greensboro? We'd be lying if we said we didn't almost spit-take a mouthful of Diet Coke (with Splenda, yummy) onto the keyboard when we read that. You've got a wide-open chance to remake your city, rebuild its political infrastructure from the ground up, and the highest you can set the bar is Madison and Greensboro? But we digress.
They're electing a bunch of new city council members. We reckon that's the main thing.
Andy Rusk
As mentioned previously, andyrusk.com is up and running, with comment functionality. Pay him a visit, and again, we'll note that Andy (though he's been strangely silent recently) is the only mayoral candidate yet to reach out to AP.
Life is Different on the Other Side of the Border
Dig this piece on the proposed updating of the sign ordinance in Oconee County. You know that in ACC, that kind of proposal wouldn't even see the pitiful light provided by Carl Jordan's lighting ordinance. We've been meaning to talk a little bit about Oconee County politics, but to be honest, don't know a whole bunch about stuff over there, other than these salient points.
We're intrigued, in a morbid sort of way, by the whole Union Point political shenanigans from last year. Allison Floyd (in what we humbly thought was one of the best pieces we've seen her do) wrote up a nice story on it last year, which is worth checking out, if you have no idea what we're talking about. If you do have a clue as to what we're referring, then today's ABH has a little somethin-somethin about the state of affairs now. Still, we're troubled by this passage.
"Now, she's one of seven newcomers and long-time residents who are running for a seat on the Union Point City Council in hopes of re-invigorating the historic mill town and turning it into a tourist destination of the same caliber as Madison and Greensboro."
Madison and Greensboro? Madison and Greensboro? We'd be lying if we said we didn't almost spit-take a mouthful of Diet Coke (with Splenda, yummy) onto the keyboard when we read that. You've got a wide-open chance to remake your city, rebuild its political infrastructure from the ground up, and the highest you can set the bar is Madison and Greensboro? But we digress.
They're electing a bunch of new city council members. We reckon that's the main thing.
Andy Rusk
As mentioned previously, andyrusk.com is up and running, with comment functionality. Pay him a visit, and again, we'll note that Andy (though he's been strangely silent recently) is the only mayoral candidate yet to reach out to AP.
Life is Different on the Other Side of the Border
Dig this piece on the proposed updating of the sign ordinance in Oconee County. You know that in ACC, that kind of proposal wouldn't even see the pitiful light provided by Carl Jordan's lighting ordinance. We've been meaning to talk a little bit about Oconee County politics, but to be honest, don't know a whole bunch about stuff over there, other than these salient points.
- They like development a whole lot more than ACC.
- Their local electeds are all Republicans.
- Becky Vaughn lives there. They didn't care for her last November.
- They didn't like Doug Haines very much either in 2002.
- They like development a whole lot more than ACC.
- They have a friggin' fantastic animal shelter, and one member of the crack editorial staff can back that up, because he got his puppy dog from them.
- The Oconee County Democratic Party, while smaller in number, seems to have its shit together when compared to the ACC Democratic Party. See this example.
Tuesday, September 27, 2005
The Gubner Has a Little Gas Problem
The ABH is festooned with folks talking about the Gubner's decision to close school yesterday and today. In an article, the usual suspects from both parties weigh in. (For the record, while we agree with him on this one, Bobby Kahn's talking points blew.)
Interestingly, three of the four letters to the editor today talk about it as well, and surprisingly, no one there seems to want to shill for the GOP.
A guy from Comer sez, "Never mind that buses are a form of mass transportation, which happens to be far more fuel-efficient than a parade of big ugly SUVs."
A first-grade teacher weighs in with some suggestions on alternate courses of action.
Our favorite comes from Mary Songster, who makes a good point. "Even more disturbing is the thought that 50 kids who would have been on one bus to one destination are now being taken by 50 different cars to 50 different locations - not saving resources, but shifting the burden.[emphasis ours]"
She makes a good point. The Gubner is making himself look good on the backs of parents who actually have to shoulder the burden of his decision.
Also, far be it from us to argue with the highly-paid consultants who tell Cathy Cox and Mark Taylor what to do, but we think the message is wrong on this one. It's not about the Gubner's priorities on education (heaven knows there's better evidence than this to point out where Sonny stands on education), and it's not "leaving parents in a bind," as the article in the ABH puts it. It's about Sonny making a rash decision to make himself look good at the expense of parents. We think that message would resonante a little more come November of next year.
But what do we know?
We'd know more with your help. Send us your tips here.
Interestingly, three of the four letters to the editor today talk about it as well, and surprisingly, no one there seems to want to shill for the GOP.
A guy from Comer sez, "Never mind that buses are a form of mass transportation, which happens to be far more fuel-efficient than a parade of big ugly SUVs."
A first-grade teacher weighs in with some suggestions on alternate courses of action.
Our favorite comes from Mary Songster, who makes a good point. "Even more disturbing is the thought that 50 kids who would have been on one bus to one destination are now being taken by 50 different cars to 50 different locations - not saving resources, but shifting the burden.[emphasis ours]"
She makes a good point. The Gubner is making himself look good on the backs of parents who actually have to shoulder the burden of his decision.
Also, far be it from us to argue with the highly-paid consultants who tell Cathy Cox and Mark Taylor what to do, but we think the message is wrong on this one. It's not about the Gubner's priorities on education (heaven knows there's better evidence than this to point out where Sonny stands on education), and it's not "leaving parents in a bind," as the article in the ABH puts it. It's about Sonny making a rash decision to make himself look good at the expense of parents. We think that message would resonante a little more come November of next year.
But what do we know?
We'd know more with your help. Send us your tips here.
Monday, September 26, 2005
Elton Dodson Writes In
Super-Commissioner Elton Dodson (insert your own "cape and tights" joke here) writes in this afternoon, to clue us in on his thoughts on the La Puerta Del Sol imbroglio and the upcoming (we hope!) War on Poverty.
He was also kind enough to send us advance copies of two letters he'll be sending in to the editors at the ABH. One concerns the LPDS jazz, the other his advocacy for public access TV in Athens. We hope that they'll both show up in the local paper tomorrow, although we have our doubts.
One point he makes it that both we and the ABH kind of got it wrong on interpreting his opinions on LPDS. In the grand tradition of political ass-covering, we would point out that the ABH was none too clear, and we appreciate Dodson putting us right.
To clarify, while Dodson is personally a fan of the LPDS project, he has been hearing a significant amount of criticism from the community. And, his decision on October 4 is not going to be influenced by worries about pissing States off. Sez Dodson:
We're glad to know that Dodson is a supporter (at least personally) of Bruno Rubio's efforts. We hope that he will be supporting LPDS officially on October 4th. Meanwhile, it's important to note that he's doing what an elected official should do in a situation like this - listening to voices from the community who contact him. Problem is, that for all of McCarter's carping on Rubio's "spin", the pro-LPDS forces really haven't done a great job of rallying up and contacting their local electeds.
Commissioner Dodson has shown, by reaching out to us, and by and through a number of actions since he took office, that he is open to hearing new ideas (as well as coming up with a few himself from time to time). So, if you're pro-tostones like us, shoot him an email and let him know how you feel about it.
The Super-Commissioner sent us a bunch of stuff in his email to the crack editorial staff; more than we can use in one post. We were planning on doing some more public access-related posting in the next day or two, and will be including some his comments in that respect then.
So we'll leave it at this for now. But, before we go, map props to the Commish for writing in, and we hope that he'll continue to do so.
He was also kind enough to send us advance copies of two letters he'll be sending in to the editors at the ABH. One concerns the LPDS jazz, the other his advocacy for public access TV in Athens. We hope that they'll both show up in the local paper tomorrow, although we have our doubts.
One point he makes it that both we and the ABH kind of got it wrong on interpreting his opinions on LPDS. In the grand tradition of political ass-covering, we would point out that the ABH was none too clear, and we appreciate Dodson putting us right.
To clarify, while Dodson is personally a fan of the LPDS project, he has been hearing a significant amount of criticism from the community. And, his decision on October 4 is not going to be influenced by worries about pissing States off. Sez Dodson:
"While Commissioner McCarter and I would find ourselves in a tense relationship if I vote for this proposal, that is in no way influential on my opinion in this matter. While I certainly give Commissioner McCarter’s options in his district careful consideration, my decisions are my own. Though as a citizen I am a regular customer and cheerleader for Mr. Rubio and his contributions to our community, my decisions as an elected representative must be consistent with the needs and demands of my constituents, especially where a proposed rezoning will directly impact surrounding neighborhoods. Rarely do so many neighborhood associations lend their collective voices to formally oppose a rezoning, as has been the case here. I would be derelict in my duty if I did not separate whatever personal feelings I have about this project from the public dialogue created by it. I have made no decision on this matter, and will not until public comment has ended during our voting meeting. At that time, I will make what I believe is the best decision for the 10th district. Whatever anger a commissioner may direct my way on any issue is irrelevant
where it is contrary to the best interests of our community. If a colleague chooses to
sever a relationship with me over a single rezoning, I believe the cost of maintaining such
a relationship is in any case too great an obstacle to effective representation and I
welcome the breach."
We're glad to know that Dodson is a supporter (at least personally) of Bruno Rubio's efforts. We hope that he will be supporting LPDS officially on October 4th. Meanwhile, it's important to note that he's doing what an elected official should do in a situation like this - listening to voices from the community who contact him. Problem is, that for all of McCarter's carping on Rubio's "spin", the pro-LPDS forces really haven't done a great job of rallying up and contacting their local electeds.
Commissioner Dodson has shown, by reaching out to us, and by and through a number of actions since he took office, that he is open to hearing new ideas (as well as coming up with a few himself from time to time). So, if you're pro-tostones like us, shoot him an email and let him know how you feel about it.
The Super-Commissioner sent us a bunch of stuff in his email to the crack editorial staff; more than we can use in one post. We were planning on doing some more public access-related posting in the next day or two, and will be including some his comments in that respect then.
So we'll leave it at this for now. But, before we go, map props to the Commish for writing in, and we hope that he'll continue to do so.
Local Legal Update
All law is politics, or so a professor once told us. One member of the crack editorial staff has decided to use his supposed expertise (at least that's what the big piece of paper on the wall and the bar card in his wallet say) to provide regular updates on the local legal scene. Every now and then, if he's feeling bold, you may even get some analysis.
First up is a heads-up from an anonymous source that a really big products liability trial will be coming soon to a courtroom near you. Namely the Athens-Clarke County State Court. Pending some possible procedural hurdles (the case is technically still up on interlocutory appeal of some pre-trial issues), the court is planning to begin trial on November 14, 2005. The trial is expected to last 4-6 weeks. The case involves a woman who was killed when her 1985 Mercury Marquis was hit from behind by a truck, and the fuel tank exploded. The suit alleges several product defects against both Ford Motor Co., the manufacturer of the vehicle, and Draw-Tite, Inc., the manufacturer of a trailer hitch that was installed on the vehicle and is alleged to have contributed to the fuel tank explosion. The law firm handling the plaintiff's case routinely gets multi-million dollar judgments in similar cases.
The crack editorial staff urges any of you who have the time to spend a day or part of one watching this or any other trial in the local courthouses. First of all, once you get past all of the preliminary stuff, it usually makes for pretty good theater (except it's not made up, it's people's lives). But more importantly, the judicial branch of our government needs to be monitored by its citizens just like all the others. Like voting and jury duty (and emailing your M & C), this is another way to be a good citizen.
More legal updates soon...
First up is a heads-up from an anonymous source that a really big products liability trial will be coming soon to a courtroom near you. Namely the Athens-Clarke County State Court. Pending some possible procedural hurdles (the case is technically still up on interlocutory appeal of some pre-trial issues), the court is planning to begin trial on November 14, 2005. The trial is expected to last 4-6 weeks. The case involves a woman who was killed when her 1985 Mercury Marquis was hit from behind by a truck, and the fuel tank exploded. The suit alleges several product defects against both Ford Motor Co., the manufacturer of the vehicle, and Draw-Tite, Inc., the manufacturer of a trailer hitch that was installed on the vehicle and is alleged to have contributed to the fuel tank explosion. The law firm handling the plaintiff's case routinely gets multi-million dollar judgments in similar cases.
The crack editorial staff urges any of you who have the time to spend a day or part of one watching this or any other trial in the local courthouses. First of all, once you get past all of the preliminary stuff, it usually makes for pretty good theater (except it's not made up, it's people's lives). But more importantly, the judicial branch of our government needs to be monitored by its citizens just like all the others. Like voting and jury duty (and emailing your M & C), this is another way to be a good citizen.
More legal updates soon...
Visit andyrusk.com
Hi everyone!
Hey, just a quick note that www.andyrusk.com is up and operational.
Check it out!
Tips.
Hey, just a quick note that www.andyrusk.com is up and operational.
Check it out!
Tips.
More Politics Than You Can Shake a Stick At
Hey everyone! How was your weekend? Great!
Hey we're glad you're back, because man, we've got a lot to talk about.
So much in fact, that we pulled an all-nighter (not by choice, mind you) and put a bunch of posts together from what was a pretty brisk news weekend in the Classic, as well as some early Monday stories that you'll be seeing. There are, in fact, so many new posts today that, in retrospect, we would have been well-served to break it down Hobbyhorse-style like Antidisingenousmetarianism. But we tend to talk more than Hilary, and besides, we ripped her off unwittingly already on the Senator Tankerbell/States McCarter thing, so we'll stay the course with individual posts, accompanied, as always, with our insightful commentary.
In order to help you navigate, here's what's new today on the ol' blog.
Got rumors, tips, gossip for us. Send it here, we'll keep your name out of it. Unless we get subpoened. Prison frightens us.
Hey we're glad you're back, because man, we've got a lot to talk about.
So much in fact, that we pulled an all-nighter (not by choice, mind you) and put a bunch of posts together from what was a pretty brisk news weekend in the Classic, as well as some early Monday stories that you'll be seeing. There are, in fact, so many new posts today that, in retrospect, we would have been well-served to break it down Hobbyhorse-style like Antidisingenousmetarianism. But we tend to talk more than Hilary, and besides, we ripped her off unwittingly already on the Senator Tankerbell/States McCarter thing, so we'll stay the course with individual posts, accompanied, as always, with our insightful commentary.
In order to help you navigate, here's what's new today on the ol' blog.
- What's going to happen to the Navy School? We hear a rumor.
- We put out a call for sources, here. Anyone in the CCSD hollah at your boys.
- Speaking of schools, what was the Gubner smoking when he cancelled school?
- The ABH bites the Constitutional hand that feeds it.
- We ramble on about Sunday and Monday's ABH editorial pages.
- La Puerta Del Sol petard-hoisting, Athens Politics style.
- Someone wants to kiss the Unified Govt. goodbye.
- Whip Count update here.
- And, candidates, debates, we're getting excited!
Got rumors, tips, gossip for us. Send it here, we'll keep your name out of it. Unless we get subpoened. Prison frightens us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)