Hey, never say we don't give the people what they want. Our friend Lefty takes note of a decision by a federal judge in Florida ruling anti-nudity laws unconstitutional, and analyzes the decision's impact on local establishments like Topper's and Chelsea's.
Read all about it here, and if Lefty's correct, we might just be moving AthPo Global HQ to that corner table at Chelsea's. Don't act like you don't know which one we're talking about.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Those nipple covers are really retarded. What is wrong with seeing a nipple? I mean, my own nipples aren't that sexy, but I consider myself to be a fan of nipples belonging to the fairer sex. All these puritanical laws really bother me.
Nipple covers aren't going to stop anyone from going to a strip joint, but they are going to stop people from enjoying the experience as much as they possibly can.
I am a big proponent of stippers rights because a lot of strippers are putting themselves through school to become doctors and lawyers, or so they tell me. I'm not a huge fan of lawyers, but hot lawyers would make jury duty a lot more interesting if I were actually eligble to be called up for jury duty.
Nipple covers stopped me from going to strip clubs. After all, if you think about it, you're paying a huge cover charge and inflated drink prices just to see something you can catch on "Wild On," or the televised Howard Stern show on E! (Exclamation point for trademark correctness, not to convey excitement or emphasis.)
I wasn't paying cover when I would go because my friend was bartending, but I think that paying cover for strip clubs sucks. They should just be happy with me drinking expensive beers.
but they are going to stop people from enjoying the experience as much as they possibly can
So are anti-prostitution laws...
Post a Comment